Claim Markers
Locates where assertion type language appears and in which section, surfacing argumentative density across the manuscript.
First ethical AI peer reviewer
Readmy is an editorial instrument, not a verdict machine. It marks where language departs from the role a section performs, then hands that map to the people whose judgement the process depends on.
The workbench
Select a marker in the manuscript or in the report panel. The traceability drawer names the attribute that produced it, the role of the section it sits in, and what was compared.
Document overview
Document copies
The core premise
Each section plays a different conversational role. Readmy tags where language departs from what that role calls for, independent of the heading labels an author chose.
It does not decide whether content is true, good or novel. It does not fact check, appraise data or make accept and reject calls. It indexes structural markers so reviewers can spend their attention on judgement.
Frames the problem and states the contribution
Describes how the work was conducted
Reports what was observed
Interprets, contextualises and argues
Core attributes
The four primary marker types carry the map. Around them sits a wider mesh of structural checks that keep the reading consistent across a whole manuscript.
Locates where assertion type language appears and in which section, surfacing argumentative density across the manuscript.
Tracks where empirical and numeric statements sit, separating evidence bearing sentences from interpretive ones.
Maps where a reference first appears, where it recurs, and whether it resolves to the reference list.
Maps text by its function in the argument, independent of the heading labels an author chose.
Ingestion is raw text only. Figures, images and tables are never ingested and never surfaced, so a figure exists to Readmy solely as the mention that calls it in the text.
The output
Readmy never reduces a manuscript to one number. It returns a structural map and a QC checklist overlaid on the document, showing where markers concentrate.
Heavy concentration in the Discussion against a light Introduction is expected, so it is not itself a concern. The Index gives reviewers structure, not a verdict.
Introduction
Section role
Methods
Section role
Results
Section role
Discussion
Section role
Privacy by design
Text is ingested a single time to tag structural features. Everything after that, the mapping, the Index and the calibration, runs on a decoy model rather than the author's language.
A decoy retains section and sentence structure while masking the words. The author's wording is never changed, never rewritten and never retained.
Text is read once, blinded, to tag structural features. Nothing is rewritten and nothing is altered.
On-device processing
Section and sentence structure is retained. The content is scrambled, and legible text is discarded.
All downstream mapping and indexing runs on the decoy, never on the author's language.
Where Readmy differs
Other tools invite anyone to review any paper and return a score without saying what was measured. Readmy takes the opposite position, in public.
How it works
A manuscript enters via the editorial office. Structural features are ingested and tagged once: claims, data, citations and section roles.
Tagged features are mapped against the role each section performs, producing concentration patterns and consistency signals.
A structural map and QC checklist returns to the reviewer, overlaid on the document and traceable marker by marker.
Request access
Readmy is deployed under institutional agreement rather than individual sign up. If your journal or editorial office wants ethical AI peer review inside its workflow, we would like to hear from you.
Why we are building itInstitutional enquiry
Contact our editorial team